Profile
Name
Cracky
Description
Subscribers
20
Subscriptions
Friends
Channel Comments
|
JafuetTheSame
(4 minutes ago)
The problem is that it doesn't fit most of the timeline of the game however. There really were no war goal locations during this time period (apart of some specific instances like Mississippi in ACW, Port Arthur in R-J). There were maybe minor strategic points like fortification or supply hub, but generally the main war goal was to concentrate all forces and cripple the enemy army in one decisive battle. So no fronts really either, just spread out armies trying to outmanouevre the enemy and find a weakness in his positioning.
|
|
yolobuck2553
(9 minutes ago)
How will parodox charge us for model updates
|
|
emrecanarduc4378
(18 minutes ago)
Why they just didnt remain vic2 war system with some quality of life improvements
|
|
monarchtherapsidsinostran9125
(27 minutes ago)
Going to be honest. From only what they said this is a bad system. Frankly i'll wait until they fix the whole thing eventually or just skip this game if they pull an imperator/march of the eagles. Imp rome at launch was terrible, but over time i think it became something nice, meanwhile march of the eagles is forgotten. Sadly i feel like this game will 100% be one of those things. It does not model real history that well from what we have seen, nor does it seem like a fun sandbox. Also we have not seen any gameplay only controlled text readings of AAR's. I wonder why that is.
|
|
SaxonSpooner
(32 minutes ago)
No more Joust De Coque
|
|
cibiose
(47 minutes ago)
Hello there
|
|
paradropgeneral4397
(52 minutes ago)
lmeo
|
Add comment